WAS JESUS A REAL PERSON - PART SEVEN

                                           WAS JESUS A REAL                 PERSON?

          Part seven

        (copied from
         Y-Jesus.com)


The New Testament

Skeptics like Ellen Johnson also dismiss the New Testament as evidence for Jesus, calling it "biased".   However, even most non-Christian historians consider ancient  New Testament manuscripts as solid evidence for Jesus' existence. Cambridge historian Michael Grant, an atheist, argues that the New Testament should be considered as evidence in the same way as other ancient history.

     "
     If we apply to the New Testament, as we should, the same sort of criteria as we should to other ancient writings containing historical material, we can no more reject Jesus'  existence than we can reject the mass of pagan      personages whose reality as historical figures is never questioned. 

"

The Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke and John) are the primary accounts of Jesus' life and words. Luke begins his Gospel with these words to Theophilus ; "Since I myself  have carefully investigated everything from the beginning, I too decided to write an orderly account for you, most excellent Theophilus."

Noted archaeologist Sir William Ramsey originally rejected Luke's historical account of Jesus. However, he later acknowledged , "Luke is a historian of the first rank...This author should be placed along with the greatest historians...Luke's history is unsurpassed in respect of its trustworthiness."

The earliest accounts of Alexander were written 300 years after him. But how close to the life of Jesus were the Gospels written? Would eyewitnesses to Jesus still be alive or was there enough time for a legend to have developed?

In the 1830's German scholars argued that  the New Testament was written in the third century, much too late to have been written by Jesus's apostles. However, manuscript copies  discovered in the 19th and 20th centuries by archaeologists proved these accounts of Jesus were written much earlier.

 William Albright dated all the New Testament books  "between about 
a.d. 50 and a.d. 75. "
 John A.T. Robinson of  Cambridge dates all  New Testament books  by a.d. 40-65.

Such early dating means they were written  when eyewitnesses were still alive, much too early for a myth or legend to develop.

After C.S. Lewis read the Gospels he wrote, " Now as a literary historian, I am perfectly convinced that... the Gospels are .. not legends.  I have read a great deal of legend and I am quite clear that they are not the same sort of thing."

The quantity of documents for the New Testament is enormous. Over 24,000 complete or partial manuscript copies of its books exist, putting iy far above all other ancient documents.

No other ancient historical person, religious or secular, is backed up by as much  documentation as is Jesus Christ. Historian Paul Johnson wrote, "if we consider that Tacitus, for example, survives in only one medieval manuscript , the quantity of  early New Testament manuscripts is remarkable.

(For more on the reliability of the New Testament, see "Are the Gospels reliable?) 

next post  15th June