EVOLUTION - PART SIX(copied from Mark Cahill's book -A heartbeat away)
The first assertion of macroevolution is that living matter came from non-living matter. There is only one problem with that. It has been shown to be impossible. The scientific method requires repeatable observations to prove something, yet despite scientist's earnest attempts, they have never been able to create life from non-life. In fact the opposite is the case.
Evolutionist Michael Moe admitted that " a century of sensational discoveries in the biological sciences has taught us that life arises only from life."
Therefore it is unscientific and inaccurate for evolutionists to claim that spontaneous generation occurred - that is that non-living chemicals produced living organisms in the distant past.
Since the law of Biogenesis dictates that life come only from life, this should raise a question in our minds: Where did the first life in the universe come from? If life always comes from life, the only logical conclusion is that life has always existed. Remember there cannot be an effect without a cause, and the effect cannot be greater than its cause. Therefore the only possibility is that we came from an eternal living Creator.
Nobel Prize Winner Francis Crick stated :
"The great majority of sequences (required for life can never be synthesized at all, at any time, .... an honest man armed with all the information available to us now , could only state that in some sense the origin of life appears to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have had to be satisfied to get it going."
In addition to life arising only from life, the Law of Biogenesis also states that life only perpetuates its own kind . Each creature's genes are uniquely programmed to reproduce only within the same species. This explains why whales produce only whales, cows produce cows, ants produce ants. and humans produce humans - which leads us tot the next problem with evolution.
next post 27th May
No comments:
Post a Comment