WAS THERE A DA VINCI CONSPIRACY - PART 4

    WAS THERE A DA          VINCI  CONSPIRACY

      PART 4

     (copied from
      Y-Jesus.com)




Deifying Jesus

To answer Brown's accusation, we must first determine what Christians in general believed, before Constantine ever convened the Council of
Nicaea.

Christians had been worshiping Jesus as God since the first century. But in the fourth century, a church leader from the East, Arius, launched a 
campaign to defend God's oneness.  He taught 
that Jesus was a specially created being, higher
than the angels, but not God. Athanasius and 
most church leaders, on the the other hand, were convinced that Jesus was God in the flesh.

Constantine wanted to settle the dispute, hoping 
to bring peace to his Empire, uniting the East 
and West divisions.  Thus in 325 A.D. he 
convened more than 300 bishops at Nicaea (now part of Turkey) from throughout the Christian world. The crucial question is, did the early church think that Jesus was the creator or merely a creation - Son of God or son of a carpenter?  
So, what did the apostles teach about Jesus?  From their very first recorded statements they regarded Him as God. About 30 years after 
Jesus' death and resurrection Paul wrote the 1Philippians that Jesus was God in human form.(Philippians 2:6-7 NLT)  and John  a close eye-witness confirms Jesus' divinity in the following passage:

"In the beginning the Word already existed. He was with God and He was God. He created everything there is. Nothing exists that He didn't make. Life itself was in Him ..So the Word became human and lived here on earth among us."  (John 1: 1-4,14,  NLT)) 


This passage from John 1 has been discovered in an ancient document and it is carbon dated  at 175-225 A.D.  Thus Jesus was clearly spoken of as  God over a hundred years before Constantine convened the Council of Nicaea. We now see that 
forensic manuscript evidence contradicts The Da Vinci Code's claim that Jesus' divinity was a fourth century  invention. But what does history tell  us about the Council of Nicaea?  Brown asserts in his book, through Teabing, that the majority of bishops  at Nicaea overruled Arius' belief  that Jesus was a "mortal prophet," and adopted the doctrine of Jesus' divinity by a very close vote."   True or false ? 

In reality, the vote was a landslide : only two of the318 bishops dissented. Whereas Arius believed  that the Father alone was God, and that Jesus was His supreme creation, the Council concluded that
Jesus and the Father were of the same divine essence.


The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit, were deemed to be distinct, coexistent, coeternal  Persons, but One God. This doctrine of One God in three Persons became known as the Nicene Creed, and is the central core of  the Christian Faith. Now, it is true that Arius was persuasive and had considerable influence. The landslide vote came after considerable debate. But in the end the Council overwhelmingly declared  Arius 
to be a heretic, since his teaching contradicted what the apostles taught about Jesus' divinity.

History also confirms that Jesus had publicly condoned the worship He received from His disciples. And, as we have seen, Paul and other disciples clearly taught that Jesus is God  and  worthy of worship. 

From the first days of the Christian church, Jesus was regarded as far more than a mere man, and most of His followers worshiped Him as Lord - The Creator of the universe. So, how could Constantine have invented the doctrine of Jesus' divinity if the church had regarded Jesus as God for more than 200 years ?   The Da Vinci Code does not address this question.

next post  18th April